Mckennas alteration to the strawsonian theory of moral responsibility now allows strawsons theory to respond to the challenge posed by watson. Although peter strawsons freedom and resentment was published 50 years ago and has been a widely discussed article,1 its main argument is still notoriously difficult to pin down. Of these, somethe pessimists perhapshold that if the thesis is true, then the concepts of moral obligation and responsibility really have no. Strawson freedom and resentment philosophy flashcards. In modern times this debate has received an enormous resurgence of interest and the contribution in 1962 by p. In freedom and resentment 1962, the british philosopher p. Remote work advice from the largest allremote company. It is an extensive version of the logical and simplistic standard argument against free will. Introduction although peter strawsons freedom and resentment was published 50.
Peter strawson freedom and resentment fischer, john martin and ravizza, mark, measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility. In our paper we want to argue, that strawsons theory may be seen as a conclusive theory of the concept person. Strawson made a contribution to the free will versus determinism discussions by pointing out that whatever the deep metaphysical truth on these issues, people would not give up talking about and feeling moral responsibility, praise and blame, guilt and pride, crime and punishment, gratitude, resentment, and forgiveness. Freedom and resentment, and other essays strawson, p. Pears, strawson on freedom and resentment philpapers. Galen strawson holds the presidents chair in philosophy at the university of texas at austins college of liberal arts.
Strawson s famous, famous 1962 paper freedom and resentment. Strawson s essay freedom and resentment, he argues that the truth or falsity of the determinist thesis would have no effect on our moral psychology and therefore the common worry that determinism undermines ordinary moral concepts and practices is unwarranted strawson, 2003. Jan 01, 1974 by the time of his death in 2006, sir peter strawson was regarded as one of the worlds most distinguished philosophers. Strawsons paper freedom and resentment really succeeds in undercutting the traditional debate about free will and suggests that the deepest source of our. The things that bother strawson are by no means trivial. He studied at the university of cambridge before receiving his bphil and dphil in philosophy from the university of oxford. The correct form for the bibliographic reference element of a citation for the selected resource is shown in a variety of the most widelyaccepted citation styles below. His more explicit concern was to look again at the question of whether determinism and freedom are consistent with one another by shifting attention to certain personal rather than moral attitudes, first of all gratitude and resentment. He was the waynflete professor of metaphysical philosophy at the university of oxford magdalen college from 1968 to 1987.
See below for information about citations and references, and how to use them. Galen strawson developed a basic argument which attempts to prove that free will and moral responsibility do not exist. Strawsons basic assumption is that we have no choice but to employ the core. Strawson 19192006 introduced an influential version of compatibilism grounded in human. Free will is the conventional name of a topic that is best discussed without reference to the will. Others say, or imply, that they do know what it is. Moral responsibility stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Strawson, as you will see, divides his paper into numbered sections. Actually, this is one of the most influential papers in the 20th century on the topic of free will, but many nonphilosophers who are deeply interested in free will dont know much about it. Strawson, freedom, and resentment first and foremost, peter strawson wishes to point out that he does not know, and does not particularly care, exactly what the thesis of determinism is. Justin coates university of chicago draft november 12, 2012 1. Strawson 19192006, in his famous 1963 essay freedom and resentment offers an elaborate account of compatibilism vs. The philosophical debate about free will and responsibility has been of great importance throughout the history of philosophy.
For strawson, interpersonal relationships are so ingrained in our humanity and are so thoroughly important to us. It may be argued that harris, although not a member of the moral community according to watson, has or had the ability to become a member of the moral community but chose not to become one. Peter strawsons paper, freedom and resentment did much to change the direction of the debate surrounding determinism. Introduction to philosophy richard holton free will iii. Peter strawson, freedom and resentment 1974 by kristen. Strawson, freedom and resentment its the second case which strawson mentions and privilegeswhen we excuse someones behavior on the grounds of abnormality or lack of rational agencythat interests me. Nevertheless it cannot solve the main problems of a philosophy of personality or personhood as they are discussed nowadays in philosophy. Peter strawsons paper freedom and resentment changed the face of the free will debate in philosophy.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Fischer, john martin, early confucian texts diagnose the pervasiveness xtrawson reactive emotions under specific social conditions and respond with the ethicalpsychological mandate to counter them in selfcultivation. On referring 1 strawsons view on russell one of the questions russells theory of descriptions was designed to answer was the question. He deals here with the illusory nature of the self, real naturalism, which he claims inherently opens the door for panpsychism, and the illusion of free will, among other topics. Essay on freedom and resentment by peter strawson 743 words. Strawson with the publication of his essay freedom and resentment has generated a wide range of discussion and criticism in the philosophical community. Benjamin kelsey under the direction of eddy nahmias abstract galen strawsons basic argument is an attempt to prove that no agent can meet the. The book is perhaps bestknown for its three interrelated chapters on perception and the imagination, subjects now at the very forefront of philosophical research. Strawson s freedom and resentment, edited by michael mckenna and paul russell. Of these, some the pessimists perhaps hold that if the thesis is true, then the concepts of moral obligation and responsibility really have no application, and the. He is only concerned with the fact that such a thesis does exist and that it involves actions being more or less determined in some sense or another. In freedom and resentment, strawson proposes a commonsense argument for compatibilism. Prior to the publication of strawsons paper in 1962, the question of whether we are free and morally responsible beings was typically seen as one which could only satisfactorily be answered metaphysically. Some philosophers say they do not know what the thesis of determinism is.
Freedom and resentment work by strawson britannica. Strawson s purpose here is to dissolve the socalled problem of determinism and responsibility. The doyen of living english philosophers, by these reflections, took hold of and changed the outlook of a good many other philosophers, if not. Nevertheless, freedom and resentment strawson 1962, is perhaps now strawsons most famous and widely. Its central questions are what is it to act or choose freely. Strawson was one of the most important philosophers of. Strawson argues that there are two different sorts of attitudes that we can take towards a person. Strawson published a large number of influential articles, ranging over language, metaphysics, epistemology, and the history of philosophy, including a highly influential one entitled freedom and resentment, first published in the proceedings of the british academy in 1960, and collected here along with some of his. The debate is of central importance to recent developments in the free will literature and has shaped the way contemporary philosophers now approach the problem.
Strawsons approach is clear and engaging despite the heady ontological topics being discussed here. On his view, when we engage in interpersonal relationships with others, we open ourselves up to experiencing certain emotions. By the time of his death in 2006, sir peter strawson was regarded as one of the worlds most distinguished philosophers. Apr 14, 2008 by the time of his death in 2006, sir peter strawson was regarded as one of the worlds most distinguished philosophers. Freedom and resentment and other essays by peter frederick. Beginning with the title essay freedom and resentment, this invaluable collection is testament to the astonishing range of strawsons thought as he discusses free will, ethics and morality, logic, the mindbody problem and aesthetics. Then you will be apt to feel, not just angry, but resentful towards them.
Peter frederick strawson 19192006 was an oxfordbased philosopher whose career spanned the second half of the twentieth century. Strawson published his essay freedom and resentment, generating a wide range of discussion and criticism in the philosophical community and beyond. Meaning and reference strawson on referring x and y are contraries df x and y cant both be true but can both be false x and y are subcontraries df x and y cant both false but can both be true y is the subaltern of x df if x is true then y is true x and y are contradictories df x and y have opposite truth value, i. In the end, he arrived at a kind of compatibilist or, as he says, optimist conclusion. Strawson observed that people display emotions such as resentment, anger, gratitude, and so on in response to the actions of others. The strawsonian theory of moral responsibility the written word. Freedom, resentment, and the metaphysics of morals princeton. First published thirty years ago but long since unavailable, freedom and resentment collects some of strawson s most important work and is an ideal introduction to his thinking on such topics as the philosophy of language, metaphysics, epistemology and aesthetics.
351 1116 305 1081 1194 40 1178 559 1034 575 205 294 939 1214 931 170 1433 1088 602 995 1470 336 777 932 99 751 17 548 213 1321 389 541 788 60 439 919 1155